Attempting to alleviate fears over Aadhaar, the CEO of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), the nodal organization executing the task, told the Supreme Court on Thursday that it doesn’t share biometric points of interest of inhabitants with anybody and that it will take the speediest PC as of now accessible “more than the life of the universe” to break its 2048-piece encryption. “Biometrics is never given out. Our software is such that the moment the resident presses the save key, entire data gets encrypted by the 2048-bit key. To break one key, the fastest computer in the world will take more than the life of the universe”, Ajay Bhushan Pandey told a five-judge Constitution seat involving Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices AK Sikri, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan.
The court is hearing a cluster of petitions testing the protected legitimacy of the Aadhaar Act. The official who was permitted by the court to make an introduction to clarify the security and different highlights of Aadhaar said this when the seat disclosed to him that there were worries that the information could be caught by others at the enrolment focuses. “Maybe when it reaches you, it gets encrypted, but at the (enrolment) centre, it may be captured by private party”, said Justice Sikri. “No,” replied Pandey.
Justice Khanwilkar called attention to that there were charges that the product utilized was outside and there was dread of information falling into wrong hands. On this, the authority said that lone the product utilized for biometric-coordinating was outside, under permit from “world’s three best organizations”. Clarifying further, he included this resembled SAP or Oracle, utilized by banks and money related organizations under permit from outside organizations that claim it. “These are intellectual properties and the companies don’t share the source code”, he said, including banks utilizing them doesn’t mean they are giving their information to the organizations.
The biometric-coordinating programming is utilized disconnected, he stated, and included “the data is fully under our control. The biometrics is anonymized before it’s given to the matching software. We segregate the Personally Identifiable Information (PII) so the software doesn’t know whose biometrics it is.” Justice Chandrachud needed to know how validation occurs for a man who has not given biometrics in view of seniority and so on. On this, the authority said there as of now existed a “special case dealing with component”.